PDGFRß Signaling Cooperates with ß-Catenin to Modulate c-Abl and Biologic Behavior of Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis.

PURPOSE: This study sought to identify ß-catenin targets that regulate desmoid oncogenesis and determine whether external signaling pathways, particularly those inhibited by sorafenib (e.g., PDGFRß), affect these targets to alter natural history or treatment response in patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In vitro experiments utilized primary desmoid cell lines to examine regulation of ß-catenin targets. Relevance of results was assessed in vivo using Alliance trial A091105 correlative biopsies. RESULTS: CTNNB1 knockdown inhibited hypoxia-regulated gene expression in vitro and reduced levels of HIF1α protein. ChIP-seq identified ABL1 as a ß-catenin transcriptional target that modulated HIF1α and desmoid cell proliferation. Abrogation of either CTNNB1 or HIF1A inhibited desmoid cell-induced VEGFR2 phosphorylation and tube formation in endothelial cell co-cultures. Sorafenib inhibited this activity directly but also reduced HIF1α protein expression and c-Abl activity while inhibiting PDGFRß signaling in desmoid cells. Conversely, c-Abl activity and desmoid cell proliferation were positively regulated by PDGF-BB. Reduction in PDGFRß and c-Abl phosphorylation was commonly observed in biopsy samples from patients after treatment with sorafenib; markers of PDGFRß/c-Abl pathway activation in baseline samples were associated with tumor progression in patients on the placebo arm and response to sorafenib in patients receiving treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The ß-catenin transcriptional target ABL1 is necessary for proliferation and maintenance of HIF1α in desmoid cells. Regulation of c-Abl activity by PDGF signaling and targeted therapies modulates desmoid cell proliferation, thereby suggesting a reason for variable biologic behavior between tumors, a mechanism for sorafenib activity in desmoids, and markers predictive of outcome in patients.

The Evolving Management of Desmoid Fibromatosis.

Desmoid fibromatosis is a rare disease caused by genetic alterations that activate ß-catenin. The tumors were previously treated with aggressive surgeries but do not metastasize and may regress spontaneously. For these reasons, in the absence of symptoms and when growth would not induce significant complications, active observation is considered first-line therapy. When intervention is required, surgery can be considered based on anatomy and risk of postoperative recurrence, but increasingly nonoperative therapies such as liposomal doxorubicin or sorafenib are prescribed. Cryoablation, chemoembolization, and high-intensity focused ultrasound can also be used to obtain local control in selected patients.

Adherence to guidelines at the patient- and hospital-levels is associated with improved overall survival in patients with gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Adherence to evidence-based guidelines in gastric cancer is low. We aimed to evaluate adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for gastric cancer at both patient- and hospital-levels and examine associations between guideline adherence and treatment outcomes, including overall survival (OS). METHODS: We applied stage-specific, annual NCCN Guidelines (2004-2015) to patients with gastric cancer treated with curative-intent within the National Cancer Database and compared characteristics of patients who did and did not receive guideline-adherent care. Hospitals were evaluated by guideline adherence rate. We identified associations with OS through multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 37 659 patients included, 32% received NCCN Guideline-adherent treatment. OS was significantly associated with both guideline adherence (51 months for patients receiving guideline-adherent treatment vs. 22 for patients receiving nonadherent treatment, p < 0.001). Treatment at a hospital with higher adherence was associated with longer OS (21 months for patients treated at lowest adherence quartile hospitals vs. 37 months at highest adherence quartile hospitals, p < 0.001), regardless of type of treatment received. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline-adherent treatment was strongly associated with longer median OS. Guideline adherence should be used as a benchmark for focused quality improvement for physicians taking care of patients with gastric cancer and institutions at large.

Systemic therapy for duodenal adenocarcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

BACKGROUND: National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced duodenal adenocarcinoma. Outcomes after systemic treatment in this rare malignancy have not been well studied. We examined utilization patterns of systemic treatment and compared overall survival of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, surgery alone, and adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Patients with stage 0 to III duodenal adenocarcinoma undergoing curative-intent surgery were identified within the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2015. Outcomes, including median overall survival and 30- and 90-day mortality, were compared based on treatment sequence (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or surgery alone). Propensity score matching on likelihood of receiving systemic treatment and landmark analysis were performed to mitigate bias. RESULTS: Of the 2,956 patients meeting inclusion criteria, most patients with known clinical stage had locally advanced disease (72%), of which 53% received systemic therapy (8% neoadjuvant, 45% adjuvant). After landmark analysis on the propensity matched cohort, patients with locally advanced disease who received systemic treatment had longer median overall survival compared to patients who underwent surgery alone (49 vs 40 months, P = .018) and a 20% lower hazard of mortality (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.93, P = .003). Patients who received neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy had similar survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant therapy was underutilized in patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline indications, despite an association with longer median overall survival and decreased hazard of mortality. Neoadjuvant therapy, although rarely used, had similar survival to adjuvant therapy. Given its other potential benefits, systemic treatment in the neoadjuvant setting may be a reasonable option in adequately selected patients with clinically advanced duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Surgical Treatment of Patients with Poorly Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: An NCDB Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Consensus guidelines discourage resection of poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (panNEC) given its association with poor long-term survival. This study assessed treatment patterns and outcomes for this rare malignancy using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS: Patients with non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the NCDB (2004-2016) were categorized based on pathologic differentiation. Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regressions identified associations with resection and overall survival (OS). Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Most patients (83%) in the cohort of 8560 patients had well-differentiated tumors (panNET). The median OS was 47 months (panNET, 63 months vs panNEC, 17 months; p < 0.001). Surgery was less likely for older patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.97), patients with panNEC (OR, 0.27), and patients with metastasis at diagnosis (OR, 0.08) (all p < 0.001). After propensity score-matching of these factors, surgical resection was associated with longer OS (82 vs 29 months; p < 0.001) and a decreased hazard of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; p < 0.001). Surgery remained associated with longer OS when stratified by differentiation (98 vs 41 months for patients with panNET and 36 vs 8 months for patients with panNEC). Overall survival did not differ between patients with panNEC who underwent surgery and patients with panNET who did not (both 39 months; p = 0.294). CONCLUSIONS: Poorly differentiated panNEC exhibits poorer survival than well-differentiated panNET. In the current cohort, surgical resection was strongly and independently associated with improved OS, suggesting that patients with panNEC who are suitable operative candidates should be considered for multimodality therapy, including surgery.

Surgical outcomes and complications of bedside tracheostomy in the ICU for patients on ECMO.

OBJECTIVE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly employed in the management of patients with severe cardiac and pulmonary dysfunction. Patients commonly require tracheostomy for ventilator liberation. Though bedside percutaneous tracheostomy is commonly performed, it has the potential for increased complications, both surgical and with the ECMO circuit. We examined surgical outcomes of bedside percutaneous tracheostomy in the ECMO population. METHODS: Patients were identified from an institutional database for bedside procedures. Demographics and data on complications were recorded. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: 37 patients on ECMO at the time of tracheostomy were identified. Median age and BMI were 43.2 and 28.0, respectively. 33 patients (89%) were on VV ECMO, and 4 (11%) were on VA ECMO. All were on anticoagulation prior to tracheostomy, which was held for 4 h before and after the procedure in all cases. There were no procedure-related deaths or airway losses. No patients experienced periprocedural clotting events of their ECMO circuit or oxygenator within 24 h. 3 patients (8%) required reintervention (re-exploration or bronchoscopy) for bleeding. Four other patients (10%) had minor bleeding controlled with packing. One patient had pneumomediastinum which resolved without intervention, and one had an occlusion of their tracheostomy which was treated with tracheostomy exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy is feasible for patients on ECMO. Further study is needed to determine specific risk factors for complications and means to mitigate these. Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy may be considered as part of the management of patients on ECMO to help facilitate liberation from mechanical support.

Features of synchronous versus metachronous metastasectomy in adrenal cortical carcinoma: Analysis from the US adrenocortical carcinoma database.

BACKGROUND: Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare, aggressive cancer. We compared features of patients who underwent synchronous versus metachronous metastasectomy. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent resection for metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma from 1993 to 2014 at 13 institutions of the US adrenocortical carcinoma group were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were categorized as synchronous if they underwent metastasectomy at the index adrenalectomy or metachronous if they underwent resection after recurrence of the disease. Factors associated with overall survival were assessed by univariate analysis. RESULTS: In the study, 84 patients with adrenocortical carcinoma underwent metastasectomy; 26 (31%) were synchronous and 58 (69%) were metachronous. Demographics were similar between groups. The synchronous group had more T4 tumors at the index resection (42 vs 3%, P < .001). The metachronous group had prolonged median survival after the index resection (86.3 vs 17.3 months, P < .001) and metastasectomy (36.9 vs 17.3 months, P = .007). Synchronous patients with R0 resections had improved survival compared to patients with R1/2 resections (P = .008). Margin status at metachronous metastasectomy was not associated with survival (P = .452). CONCLUSION: Select patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma may benefit from metastasectomy. Patients with metachronous metastasectomy have a more durable survival benefit than those undergoing synchronous metastasectomy. This study highlights need for future studies examining differences in tumor biology that could explain outcome disparities in these distinct patient populations.

Development of a Novel c-MET-Based CTC Detection Platform.

UNLABELLED: Amplification of the MET oncogene is associated with poor prognosis, metastatic dissemination, and drug resistance in many malignancies. We developed a method to capture and characterize circulating tumor cells (CTC) expressing c-MET using a ferromagnetic antibody. Immunofluorescence was used to characterize cells for c-MET, DAPI, and pan-CK, excluding CD45(+) leukocytes. The assay was validated using appropriate cell line controls spiked into peripheral blood collected from healthy volunteers (HV). In addition, peripheral blood was analyzed from patients with metastatic gastric, pancreatic, colorectal, bladder, renal, or prostate cancers. CTCs captured by c-MET were enumerated, and DNA FISH for MET amplification was performed. The approach was highly sensitive (80%) for MET-amplified cells, sensitive (40%-80%) for c-MET-overexpressed cells, and specific (100%) for both c-MET-negative cells and in 20 HVs. Of 52 patients with metastatic carcinomas tested, c-MET CTCs were captured in replicate samples from 3 patients [gastric, colorectal, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC)] with 6% prevalence. CTC FISH demonstrated that MET amplification in both gastric and colorectal cancer patients and trisomy 7 with gain of MET gene copies in the RCC patient. The c-MET CTC assay is a rapid, noninvasive, sensitive, and specific method for detecting MET-amplified tumor cells. CTCs with MET amplification can be detected in patients with gastric, colorectal, and renal cancers. IMPLICATIONS: This study developed a novel c-MET CTC assay for detecting c-MET CTCs in patients with MET amplification and warrants further investigation to determine its clinical applicability. Mol Cancer Res; 14(6); 539-47. ©2016 AACR.